Sunday, November 9, 2008

Emotion and New Religious Movements

Well this week was a bit of a challenge.  As promised, I had to ask myself repeatedly “Just how does this fit in with my research?”  since trying to incorporate the study of emotion into policy decisions and law would be like trying to drive a round peg through a square hole.  I did, however, see some connections between the study of emotion and the study of how fringe movements separate themselves from society, that I can now cling to.  I found myself especially interested in Corrigan’s description of the dichotomy between the universality of emotion and the societal framework in which it operates.   Anything that is universally recognizable but socially malleable is a very useful tool for groups wanting to distance themselves from normative society.   Emotion is a universal language, but it is a language so regulated that any deviation from the norm becomes suspect.  Searching the internet, it becomes evident quickly that fringe groups and new religious movements play off emotion as a means to distance both themselves and their members.

St. John’s Episcopal Church

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VukgewIuN8

(you will get the point after 20 seconds or so)

Snake Handlers in West Virginia

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iUdc5h10zTo&feature=related

 

I think whoever originally came up with all the WASP stereotypes must have visited St. John's Episcopal Church.  The service, to an outsider, is rather bland and robotic.  I’m sure many of the people in the video are emotional about their religion, but like many groups in North America and Europe regulate emotion to the private sphere.  The second video has, well, snakes and dancing and is the sort of display that the people at St. John’s would probably find rather disconcerting.  It wouldn’t just be the dancing about brandishing poisonous vipers that would disturb them, but the apparent bliss and emotion involved (many groups weep while holding the snake).  The communal emotion the snake handlers bring into their service, like most Pentecostals,  is a part of their theology, their ritual, and their identity.  Emotion is one way in which they differentiate themselves socially from ‘the norm’. The snake handlers just decided to up the ante a little on their Pentecostal cousins by adding arsenic.  A similar phenomenon could be seen in the article about ritual weeping in Kabbalah.  The mystics of Safed were differentiating themselves from the rabbinical norm through both their theology and their rituals, and weeping was a part of both.

Louis Theroux (honestly, if you ever have an hour to kill watch this entire documentary.  It’s great.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0R1BgZsYlI
(Watch from around 7:50 on)

A new religious movement (NRM) has to find ways to ‘break’ their recruits ‘fixed-faces’, and using ‘unconventional’ displays of emotion is  an effective means distance itself away from the dominate society in order to attract the disaffected.  The majority of new members in NRMs within North America/Europe are middle class, educated twenty somethings from protestant or catholic traditions, and groups tend to attract these young people by offering the opposite of the ‘mainstream’; an emotive, communal experience.  Taboo emotions are especially powerful, as the guru in the above video taps into with his anger mediation, or the Children of God (I think they are the Family now..its hard to keep track) tap into with their rather liberal take on love.  Distancing from the emotional norms has the same effect as dressing differently or shaving your heads (such as in the Hare Krishna), and is a powerful means of both incorporating people within a group and distancing them from others outside.  The anti-cult movement uses emotion as well.  It portrays NRM members as either fanatically emotional or robotically detached, both clear signs of ‘brainwashing’.  For example, in an episode of Southpark Stan’s anti-Mormon rant at the end of “all about Mormons” begins with “Why do you guys have to be so happy all the time?!”.  For the inverse, in the ‘Joy of Sect’ episode of the Simpsons the family gets involved with the ‘movementarians’ and become automatons only capable of praising their illustrious ‘Leader’.  Both excessive emotion and lack of emotion are seen as deviant in our relatively repressed mainstream culture.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/d6/5F23.jpg/200px-5F23.jpg

The writings above are simply me musing on what emotion could do.  Emotion is an interesting social tool, and in that way can be used to analyze how organizations construct themselves.   This week’s reading surprised me, since I wasn’t expecting the study of emotion to be so diverse.  I thought I was going to be reading a rehashing of our look at ritual studies last week, so it was a nice reading works on sophistic rhetoric and kabalahistic theology.  

4 comments:

Ada Chidichimo Jeffrey said...

Hey Mike,
It seems like 'emotion' has become the modern by-word for the 'transcendent' or 'the wholly other' that Otto and other 19th century scholars stated was the hallmark of religion. It was a way of protecting the discourse from the reductionist discourse of sociologists, anthropologists and psychologists who might "explain religion away". Maybe emotion is used by these groups to protect their religion and their discourse about it? They distance themselves from society with displays of emotion that transgress the norm, their experience of the divine justifying these outbursts, and at the same time, the emotional outbursts are 'proof' of the divine they are experiencing. It's a neat way to have emotion and religion reinforce one another, while legitimizing one's stance apart from the majority.
Awesome post and great examples!

Anonymous said...

Hey Mike,

Loved the Southpark reference in your post this week!

In the discussion on emotion and its functions, specifically in using emotion for differentiating from the "norm", I wonder to what extent it is a conscious choice by a participant to "use" emotion in the way that you describe? I wonder how far this use goes- whether it used in the same way by the practitioners and conductors of a ritual like snake handling...

I can certainly see how practices serve to distinguish groups from one another. What would you say about the intentionality factor in using emotion to construct identity?

Nathalie LaCoste said...

Hey Mike,

I liked the different approach you took this week of incorporating movie clips and images. They made the idea of emotion really come alive. What struck me the most was the power of emotion. There is something about it that is so powerful! I think you are right about fringe movements and their desire to move away from any normative and hence often develop different emotional experiences.

A question which i am still musing over is the value of the study of emotion. It seems to me that it is an extremely difficult thing to study. I mean, would we use an emotion-meter whereby the very emotional would be on the left and the not so emotional on the right? Or is emotion less empiricle but more about experiences, and thus cannot be analyzed on a scale?

unreuly said...

heya mike!
you, like nat, point out the 'irrationality' of emotion. what about the emotive experience is illogical, i wonder. to me, emotionality is wholly tied in with ritual and living religion. even in the realm of policy and law making, at the ground level emotions come into play...
how would a bottom-up model of emotion and policy look?